Laurelwood Park Being Considered for Makeover

The Foster Green EcoDistrict is proposing to create a master plan for Laurelwood Park, which now sits somewhat underutilized at the corner of SE Holgate, Foster, and 63rd.  Presenting this proposal at last night’s Foster-Powell Neighborhood Association meeting, the EcoDistrict’s co-chair, Ryan Givens, explained Foster Green’s desire to improve Laurelwood Park as part of their task to enhance the environmental and economic vitality of the Foster Corridor.  Presumably, the new master plan would lead to enhanced green and open space in the neighborhood.

According to Givens, the proposal would include three public engagement sessions in which community feedback would help determine a concept plan, as well as cost estimates.  The process would begin with the help of volunteer designers and consultants, and then proceed to an engagement with the PDC, Parks and Rec, and other city bureaus.

While all this is fine and good, why Laurelwood Park?

The need for enhanced green and open space is obvious in outer SE Portland.  But does Laurelwood Park need improving?  Surely this is a subjective question, and it’s clear that there are less-improved and less green areas all along Foster.  And even though the early stages of this proposal are built around volunteer time and planning, the creation of a master plan and ultimate build out of it would require resources down the road.  And since Foster Green has limited resources as is, it’s curious that an already-developed park would be the recipient of such focus while so many bleak corners of Foster are in need of attention.  So while the thought of an improved park is nice in theory, it does become a question of equity and proper allocation of resources.

At this point, though, no funding is being directed to the project.  And for this reason, there’s no harm in exploring what improvements (if any) can be made.  And if those improvements lead to the preservation of the trees that are already there, but somehow manage to create a more accessible and engaging park…great.  Let’s just hope it doesn’t hinder Foster Green’s ability to enhance the whole of Foster Road with similar projects.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Laurelwood Park Being Considered for Makeover

  1. Nick Falbo says:

    I like Laurelwood as it is, But i’d love too see it upgraded (I’m imagining a sweet triangle fountain in the center). That said, I share your reservations about focusing attention here where it may not be needed the most.

    I spoke with the Portland Parks & Rec staff at one of the last open houses, and she mentioned that adding new parks are very unlikely. Small parks like Laurelwood cost a lot to maintain (relative to their size) and there is no money for new park acquisition.

    But why not try? If other parts of Foster need parks, let’s make sure they get them. Does anyone have ideas for where they could go?

  2. Danae says:

    I agree with the leave Laurelwood as it is sentiment. And ok, so Portland Parks says there’s no money for new parks – how about a redesign of Kern Park? It’s heavily used, in dire need of an update and has lots of underused space.

  3. Spiffy says:

    I’d like to see a playground there… I used to walk by there a lot with my kid and although sticks and rocks are great toys it’s sometimes good to have something to climb on besides cement…

    also, I think the presence of a playground would help slow down automobiles…

  4. Pat says:

    I think a playground would help create more foot-traffic and make it more desirable for parents to walk in the area with their kids. In saying that they would probably need to fence it because the road is so busy and unsafe. My two girls think the park looks scary in its current state.

    • I agree, a playground would make it look a little more desirable…or at least utilized.

      To be honest, if I were to make a change, it would probably be to remove the fence that separates the park from SEIU. By removing it, you get more space, it would become a little more “airy”, and would integrate the active use of SEIU workers/visitors into the park scene.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s